We use only the cookies needed to run the site and keep you signed in. No analytics, no advertising. Your answer covers anything optional we add later.

Cookie statement
IPMERC Research

Process

2 papers

The recruitment process itself: attempts, conversations, qualification, and the steps that decide the outcome.

In 2026, platform vendor Phenom audited 219 employers across eight industries on the automation of their hiring process. On attracting, engaging, and converting candidates, employers average 62% of the attainable maximum. On qualification after the apply click, the same employers average 21%, a gap of 41 percentage points. 94% do not schedule an interview at the point of application. 99% do not use video interviews inline. Less than 1% have a fully orchestrated qualification process. For frontline roles, 85% sit in the lowest automation tier. For knowledge worker roles the figure is 93%. No industry scores above 30%. The data comes from a platform vendor measuring against its own product categories, and that caveat applies to every use of the figures.

A 2026 survey of more than a hundred organisations by Aptitude Research shows that 35% of recruiter time goes to interview coordination, 25% to screening, and 24% to candidate communication. Of the 219 employers Phenom audited, 94% do not offer automated interview scheduling at the point of application. 6% do. 1% deploy a voice screening agent. 57% of surveyed organisations already use some form of automation agent, but adoption clusters at the front of the process, not at the coordination steps that consume the largest share of hours.